The Eden Protection Act—OPEA—isn’t just another bill floating in the noise. It’s a direct strike at the political machinery that profits off grief, trauma, and identity, especially when children are involved.
Let me be clear: this bill doesn’t police beliefs. It doesn’t silence speech. What it does is target the mechanics of exploitation, specifically the deceptive fundraising tactics that manipulate public emotions and convert suffering into campaign revenue.
Every single clause in this proposal is grounded in real-world tactics already in use. And every footnote in the accompanying exposé, The Manufactured Outrage Machine, is backed by public evidence. If the system has nothing to hide, then this bill has nothing to fear.
I didn’t write this because I want to run for office. I wrote it because no one else would. And it’s time we stop pretending that awareness is enough. Here’s how OPEA confronts the beast where it lives.
What OPEA Does
First, it forces transparency, whereas secrecy has been the profit model. Under OPEA, no one is allowed to raise money off a child’s trauma or identity without verified consent. If someone does, they’re required to disclose exactly how those funds are allocated—how much is going to the family and how much is being funneled into political operations. That alone dismantles the emotional bait-and-switch tactic that drives viral outrage donations. When people know where the money goes, the manipulation collapses.
Second, it introduces real legal and financial risk. Violators face up to $50,000 per offense, with triple damages if the deception was intentional. And here’s the kicker—whistleblowers are eligible for 15 to 30 percent of those penalties. That flips the economy of corruption: what used to be profitable now becomes a liability. Exploitation becomes a financial risk rather than a political strategy.
But what happens if the state refuses to act? That’s where OPEA changes the game again. If the Attorney General doesn’t enforce the law within 120 days, anyone directly affected has the right to sue. It decentralizes enforcement—no more bottlenecks or bureaucracy shielding bad actors. Every exploited family, ally, or informed citizen becomes a potential enforcer of justice.
And then there’s the emotional manipulation that fuels these campaigns in the first place. OPEA doesn’t ban it, but it forces honesty. If a fundraiser can’t prove consent, they must publicly state that the campaign is unaffiliated with the individual and that none of the money will go to them. That shatters the illusion of noble cause marketing. It turns emotional exploitation into visible dishonesty. And the second that illusion breaks, the virality dies with it.
Why This Bill Is Different
Here’s something that’s never been done before: the entire exposé behind this bill is written into the legislation itself. The Manufactured Outrage Machine isn’t just a backstory—it’s canonized as an official exhibit. That means journalists, lawyers, and everyday people now have a legal, documented narrative to cite when demanding reform. This bill doesn’t just outline a policy—it gives people a weapon to challenge corruption directly.
Now, let’s talk comparisons. OPEA takes the enforcement model used in Texas SB8, where private citizens, not the state, were responsible for lawsuits, and improves on it. Where SB8 avoided state oversight, OPEA builds it in. Where SB8 faced ethical backlash, OPEA is ethically grounded, focused on transparency, consent, and fraud prevention.
Compared to Civil RICO, which targets long-term criminal enterprises with a high burden of proof, OPEA is easier to trigger. It only requires verified deception tied to a minor’s exploitation. And it adds something RICO never did—financial incentives for whistleblowers. That makes it a practical tool for the public, not just prosecutors.
A New Enforcement Model
And while anti-SLAPP laws are designed to protect free speech from being shut down, OPEA flips the logic. It doesn’t limit opinion—it regulates deceptive financial conduct. It was written with constitutional case law in mind, carefully carving a path between regulation and First Amendment protections. It’s designed to survive legal challenges, and it includes narrow definitions and a severability clause to ensure it holds even if parts are struck down.
Built to Survive Legal Attacks
So will it face backlash? Absolutely. Political consultants, PACs, and lobbyists who depend on trauma-based marketing will come after this with everything they’ve got. But the moral clarity of this bill—protecting exploited minors from deceptive fundraising—has bipartisan potential. Especially in the current political climate, where the exploitation of children for political narrative is finally facing public scrutiny.
And unlike theoretical proposals, OPEA is anchored in a real case. I built this around actual evidence involving Rep. Laurel Libby. It’s not just speculative—it’s documentable. The exposé is already live, the proof is already out there, and this bill gives people the means to act on it.
I also baked with public participation. If lawmakers ignore it, whistleblowers and the media can pick up the torch. If the state stays silent, civilians can sue. If the system tries to hide it, the public can pull it back into the light.
Where other laws fail, OPEA goes further. It doesn’t base enforcement on ideology. It targets fraud. It builds public access directly into the structure. And it walks the line between legal caution and moral fire.
The Eden Protection Act doesn’t just name the outrage machine.
It rewires it.
Want to support this bill? Share it, cite it, or submit it to your lawmakers.
The exposé is live, The evidence is public. The weapon is yours.