You can’t lie to donors and call it politics.
Rep. Laurel Libby raised over $160,000, claiming she needed help to fight an “unconstitutional censure.”
But campaign finance reports show no legal expenses. No attorneys. No court filings. Nothing but ads, consultants, and PAC transfers.
This wasn’t a defense. It was deception, with a donation button.
The Charges the Public Should Be Asking
- Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)
Using digital platforms to obtain money through false claims = felony. Libby used donation pages and viral media to mislead donors about legal needs.
2. FEC Violations (11 C.F.R. § 109.21)
PACs coordinated ads, events, and media strategy directly aligned with her campaign. That’s not “independent.” That’s illegal in-kind contributions.
3. Contribution Limit Violations (52 U.S.C. § 30116(a))
PACs were used to bypass donor caps, acting as laundering funnels under the guise of independence.
The Evidence Is Overwhelming
- 78% of Libby’s so-called “legal defense fund” went to campaign operations
- Her campaign reported no legal costs in official filings
- PACs spent $35,000+ on Fox News, Newsmax, and digital ads timed to her fundraising posts
- Donation spikes of 35–60% followed media events linked to PAC ad spending
Why This Case Matters
If Libby’s fundraising model goes unchallenged, it creates a blueprint for:
- Political actors fabricate crises
- PACs to hide campaign spending
- Donors are to be deceived with no accountability
It’s not a loophole. It’s a weapon.
Read the Full Report & Legislation
Contact Me for Media or Licensing
E-mail:
lilithblackwell@proton.me
jerica@jericamorningstar.com